[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Arabic-Emacs questions
- To: developer at arabeyes dot org
- Subject: Re: Arabic-Emacs questions
- From: Mohammed Elzubeir <elzubeir at arabeyes dot org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:58:26 -0500
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:53:43PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Naoto wrote:
>
>
> > Yes; they should be highlighted though. If the user, on the other
> > hand, specifies tatweel as part of his/her search then the search
> > should be a "strict" search in which tatweels ought not be ignored.
>
> Hmm... Then we must provide another incremental search, say
> isearch-forward-arabic, which behaves as if the user is searching a
> regular expression in which each base letter is followed by zero or
> more tanweens. Since we already have isearch-forward-regexp, it
> should not be so difficult to implement.
>
I am not sure if we're talking about 'tatweel' or 'tanween' here. 'tatweel' is
simply extending the word so it takes up more space. I can't think of any
reason why anyone would want to search for a word with explicit 'tatweel'
characters (but you never know).
> By the way, I thought tanweens are rarely used in written Arabic.
> They are used only in the Qur'an and elementary textbooks, aren't
> they? Frankly speaking, I did not expect that you care about
> tanweens.
You are right, explicit tanween is not very often used in the literature
(unless the intention is either academic or for a demonstration). However,
it is sometimes used randomly (at least when written by hand).
okay, time to compile Emacs ;)
later
--
-------------------------------------------------------
| Mohammed Elzubeir | Visit us at: |
| | http://www.arabeyes.org/ |
| Arabeyes Project | Homepage: |
| Unix the 'right' way | http://fakkir.net/~elzubeir/|
-------------------------------------------------------