[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: U+3000 limit
- To: developer at arabeyes dot org
- Subject: Re: U+3000 limit
- From: Mohammed Elzubeir <elzubeir at fakkir dot net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:22:19 -0600
- Cc: i18n at XFree86 dot Org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:46:27PM +0000, Markus Kuhn wrote:
>
> I have updated
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html#xfontstruct
>
> to tell the full story on this subject.
>
Okay ;) Now I understand XFree86's problem. I guess my next question is,
what is the easiest way for US (Arabeyes) to make those characters
available. We don't care if it's 10x20 or any other. Let me elaborate:
After discussing this a bit (and I may be just talking none-sense), we
have two choices:
1. Pick one of the two approaches as per your above link
2. Change the truncating script to produce a file w/ what it truncates,
(unless there is a separate font file that has the drawings already)
allowing external apps (not directly on top of Xlib) to load the file w/
Arabic glyph drawings and encode them internally, then render them.
It seems to me that XFree86's #1 priority is optimization for the English
language, and not i18n and then optimization. On the other hand, our
#1 priority is the availability of full Arabic fixed-width fonts, and time
is a big factor.
Given our inexperience w/ XFree86 internals, what would your recommendation
be?
Thanks.
--
-------------------------------------------------------
| Mohammed Elzubeir | Visit us at: |
| | http://www.arabeyes.org/ |
| Arabeyes Project | Homepage: |
| Unix the 'right' way | http://fakkir.net/~elzubeir/|
-------------------------------------------------------