[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Developer digest, Vol 1 #83 - 1 msg
- To: <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Developer digest, Vol 1 #83 - 1 msg
- From: "Hatem Abdel-Wahab" <hatem at mtse dot com dot eg>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:17:04 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: <developer-request at arabeyes dot org>
To: <developer at arabeyes dot org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:51 AM
Subject: Developer digest, Vol 1 #83 - 1 msg
> Send Developer mailing list submissions to
> developer at arabeyes dot org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> developer-request at arabeyes dot org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> developer-admin at arabeyes dot org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Developer digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Internal number storage (Roozbeh Pournader)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 02:08:56 +0330 (IRT)
> From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at sharif dot edu>
> To: developer at arabeyes dot org
> Subject: Re: Internal number storage
> Reply-To: developer at arabeyes dot org
>
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Mohammed Elzubeir wrote:
>
> > I would like to note, that there is no such thing as European numerals.
The
> > only European numerals are the Roman numerals.
> >
> > 0660-0669 are hindi numerals
> > 0030-0039 are Arabic numerals
> >
> > The description of Arabic numerals as 'non-hindi' or 'european' is vague
> > and misleading. I know it's confusing, and we would like to call things
by
> > who is apparently making better use of, but that's not what they are
> > called.
>
> Sorry, I just came to this. The terms I use, is just a try for
> non-confusing terms. These are the terms used by Unicode. Quoting The
> Unicode Standard Version 3.0, page 191,
>
> The Unicode Standard includes both *Indic* digits (including forms used
> with different Indic scripts), *Arabic* digits (with forms used in most
> of the Arabic world), and *European* digits (now used internationally).
> Because of this decision, the traditional names could not be retained
> without confusion. In addition, there are two main variants of the
Arabic
> digits---those used in Iran and Pakistan (here called *Eastern
> Arabic-Indic*) and those used in other parts of the Arabic world.
>
> [...] These names have been chosen to reduce the confusion involved in
the
> use of the decimal number forms. [...] as with the choice of any other
> names, they are meant to be unique distinguishing labels and should not
be
> viewed as favoring one culture over another.
>
> BTW, in Iran we call Unicode's "Eastern Arabic-Indic" digits "Persian"
> digits, and its "European" digits "Latin" ones.
>
> roozbeh
>
> --
> Note: If you want me to read a message, please make sure you include my
> address in "To" or "CC" fields. I may not be able to follow all the
> discussions on the mailing lists I subscribe. Sorry. (No, there's no
problem
> to receive duplicates.)
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at arabeyes dot org
> http://arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
>
>
> End of Developer Digest