Hi John
Thank you very much for your answer, at least I can get a way with it now, by stating that "digest" is misleading :D.
So you definitely recommend non-digest? well, all understood, I'm off to try it. As long I don't miss nothing ;)
From what you saying, I'll be getting each topic in a different email!, is this correct?
Thanks in advance
Salam << Peace :-)
A.Haq
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:19:30 -0500
From: "Boncek, John" <jboncek at hunter dot com>
Subject: RE: nadim's concern! (Khaled Hosny)
To: "General Arabization Discussion" <
general at arabeyes dot org>
Message-ID:
<BB7A3D4475F89F4696DC91D40AA5F38F08030492 at mailbox dot Hunter dot com
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
As a native speaker of English, I can confidently tell you that "digest"
means a condensed version of something else, usually multiple items
packaged together. In this case, the use of the term may be a little
misleading -- I doubt there is any condensing. It's probably just an
all-in-one mailing of messages that would be sent separately otherwise. I
haven't subscribed to your digest, but that's what some other mailing
lists do. To be sure of getting everything, don't use the digest option.