[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: nadim's concern! (Khaled Hosny) (Boncek, John)
- To: general at arabeyes dot org
- Subject: RE: nadim's concern! (Khaled Hosny) (Boncek, John)
- From: "A.Haq Abbad" <haqman at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:46:29 +0100
Thank you very much for your answer, at least I can get a way with it now, by stating that "digest" is misleading :D.
So you definitely recommend non-digest? well, all understood, I'm off to try it. As long I don't miss nothing ;)
From what you saying, I'll be getting each topic in a different email!, is this correct?
Thanks in advance
Salam << Peace :-)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:19:30 -0500
From: "Boncek, John" <jboncek at hunter dot com>
Subject: RE: nadim's concern! (Khaled Hosny)
To: "General Arabization Discussion" <
general at arabeyes dot org>
<BB7A3D4475F89F4696DC91D40AA5F38F08030492 at mailbox dot Hunter dot com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
As a native speaker of English, I can confidently tell you that "digest"
means a condensed version of something else, usually multiple items
packaged together. In this case, the use of the term may be a little
misleading -- I doubt there is any condensing. It's probably just an
all-in-one mailing of messages that would be sent separately otherwise. I
haven't subscribed to your digest, but that's what some other mailing
lists do. To be sure of getting everything, don't use the digest option.