My understanding is that creator of software has the right to license the same code-base under different licenses. Rough example would be Trolltech's licensing of Qt for KDE and commercial purposes.
The "Nafees Web Naskh" is open source under all licenses. On the request of Urdu OSS community, it has been specifically and separately issued under GPL.
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 06:58:51 +0200
From: Mohammed Adnène Trojette <adn at diwi dot org>
Subject: Re: Urdu - [G-I] Indic and arabic fonts; which are best?
To: General Arabization Discussion <
general at arabeyes dot org>
Message-ID: <20060528045851 dot GA25177 at diwi dot org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
What do you mean by "non-GPL uses"?
What is wrong with the CRULP License is this (at least):
| The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package
| but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold
| by �itself.
Isn't this incompatible with GPL?
--
adn
Mohammed Adn�ne Trojette
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General at arabeyes dot org
http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
End of General Digest, Vol 29, Issue 7
**************************************