Re: Which type of mushaf ins Unicode encoding?

[Abdulhaq Lynch <al-arabeyes at alinsyria dot fsnet dot co dot uk>]

On Saturday 25 June 2005 14:37, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> Do you mean "not incorporated into the tamweem"?
>
If it had the meem in it then it would be, according to Thomas' definition, a 
tamweem (I think - perhaps Thomas can define exactly what a tamweem is, is it 
the tanween+iqlaab grapheme or the process of changing (=iqlaab) the nuun into 
meem that everyone else calls iqlaab). But the meem is not 
in the tanween in this example so it remains a tanween IMO.

> Personally I lean toward "iqlaab" over "tamweem", unless we have a case
> where the little meem does not indicate iqlaab.

It always means iqlaab (as far as I know, please correct me if anyone knows 
better).

> In that case, I would 
> encode both iqlaab and tamweem.
>
> I would encode your example:
>
> 	<qaf><damma><tanween><iqlaab>
>

That's exactly what I think too.

wassalaam
abdulhaq