[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: New Public Review Issues]



FYI. Arabic-specific issues from Unicode.
--- Begin Message ---
The Unicode Technical Committee has posted two new issues for public  
review and comment. Details are on the following web page:

	http://www.unicode.org/review/

Review periods for the new items close on August 9, 2005.

Please see the page for links to discussion and relevant documents.  
Briefly, the new issues are:


72  	Stability of the Bidi Mirrored Property

In a bidirectional context, the images of many characters need to be  
oriented depending on the writing direction of the text in which they  
occur. The Bidi Mirrored property defines this behavior, but the model it  
implements has a few inconsistencies. Ideally, these would be corrected,  
but doing so will destabilize all documents containing the affected  
characters. A stability policy would freeze future changes, but should one  
last round of improvements be carried out? Your input on the range of  
possible actions is solicited, whether you are a language expert, user. or  
implementer.


73 	Representative Glyphs for Arabic Characters U+06DF, U+06E0, and U+06E1

The representative glyphs for several Arabic characters used to annotate  
the Koran have been reported as being possibly incorrect. The UTC has  
tentatively decided to revise them as explained in the accompanying  
document. The UTC invites anyone knowledgeable in their use to provide  
additional information or recommendations.


If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post them by  
submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page:

    http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html

If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please use  
the following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware that  
discussion comments on the Unicode mail list are not automatically recorded  
as input to the UTC. You must use the reporting link above to generate  
comments for UTC consideration.

    http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html

Regards,
	Rick McGowan
	Unicode, Inc.


--- End Message ---