[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tanween variants and Unicode
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Tanween variants and Unicode
- From: "Mete Kural" <metek at touchtonecorp dot com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:14:09 -0700
From: Gregg Reynolds <gar at arabink dot com>
>For sukun I can definitely imagine somebody wanting to place it above a
Can you please exemplify?
>> This canonical equivalence of fathatan with fatha+fatha, etc. is
>> personally not very important for me. This is one of the things Tom
>> wants to propose and feels strongly about. At this point I haven't
>> comprehended the real importance for this canonical equivalence so I
>> would suggest you direct your questions about this one to Tom.
>Ok. Who's Tom? Do you mean Thomas Milo?
Yes, Thomas Milo.