[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [doc] [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#577254: [Pkg-fonts-bugs] Bug#577254: Bug#577254: ttf-arabeyes: Wrong width of diacritics in some fonts
- To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle at debian dot org>
- Subject: Re: [doc] [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#577254: [Pkg-fonts-bugs] Bug#577254: Bug#577254: ttf-arabeyes: Wrong width of diacritics in some fonts
- From: Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug dot org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:52:35 +0200
- Cc: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>, 577254 at bugs dot debian dot org, Thamer Mahmoud <thamer dot mahmoud at gmail dot com>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RWlFBJvdE0CLq7BwdPaZjoSKT8/2bqkHQyZYO2X4tLs=; b=YGbSqO+PHtAzIR4HRtvyMPd+1VS38Sn0Q3FJsibS6WbpjtOV7lMwaf4QCN7HxPXuRz Ferv/pewoj6lA2UgU85itULar3M5MXhJQoX4b8TkMqy51axK8zop1svnyz5dmNEQAPjp s4PwT5iMJVrayhNCk8K3cuzYk0aWJtMRquLGo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Mgk1MbUGUlcYCOy9AbFjJclGSgPL4Acv/epG4x/2bl04kSHfeRRDPf+kxjTio3Tdlt Rq9hG9mkbwx9frBr7RHFfhzyhDmHYmCrX8meVRx4xW1EbzO0seot6xxADtwanHUBT9J7 Kl0JP+jfQxoDJnB0VmJQWYtUuBJzHxJJg4XW0=
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 12:37:26PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubulle at debian dot org):
> > While using a Xft-enabled Emacs23, I noticed that some fonts included
> > > > in this package have "wide" Arabic diacritics, almost taking up the
> > > > whole line. I did some testing, and I think that this problem is
> > > > caused by the large values of width of diacritics used in some of
> > > > these fonts.
> > >
> > > Some of the diacritic glyphs in some fonts have negative width, and I
> > > think it is causing this weired behaviour in Emacs. I'm going to fix it,
> > > but I guess emacs should handle negative glyph widths in a better way.
> > As I understand, that will mean a new "upstream" version release in
> > Arabeyes.org. Am I right
> > If that's correct, please keep us posted so that we can fix the font
> > in Debian (and later on Ubuntu).
> Has there been any progress on this?
Sorry for the delay, a new release that, hopefully, fixes this issue have
been uploaded to sourceforge. Please someone tests it with Emacs:
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
Free font developer
Description: Digital signature