Re: masdar or fi3l amr

[Youcef Rabah Rahal <rahal at arabeyes dot org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Salam,

On Monday 23 February 2004 06:10, Mohammed Elzubeir wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 22:23, Arafat Medini wrote:
> > Salam,
> >
> > I had a disucssion with some other ppl about this problem and their
> > reaction was identical to that of my sister: the pc asks THEM to make
> > the action!
>
> If people who use MS feel that the PC is ordering them to open a file
> (which makes sense, so when the OS crashes, they feel it's their
> fault!).. then that's a psychological problem they need to figure out
> themselves. I thought this was done with. This subject makes me so
> irritable. It is beyond any doubt that fi3l amr should be used. People
> also agreed that the world was flat. Now, let's get over with this
> silliness.
>
> QAC members.. whenever you have your meeting, _I_ WILL BE PRESENT just
> for this issue. Frankly I am sick of seeing it come up again.

First of all, you should be IN the QAC ! Meeting or not meeting.

As you can see, There is now a Wiki page for QAC discussions:

 http://wiki.arabeyes.org/QacDiscussions

Which can already be populated
(http://lists.arabeyes.org/archives/doc/2004/February/msg00109.html)

Since the decisions will sure be taken by vote, everyone's opinion will be 
taken into account.

> > When asking them at the end of my little test about which is more
> > confortable and less irritating, their answer (All) was the masdar. So
> > I'll be the hardliner here and I'll stick with masdar ;)
>
> And you are about to meet the harder liner. Ladies and gentlemen,
> welcome to the show ;)

I'm not sure what is all this 'hard(er)liner' stuff about ;)

Salam,

- -- 
Youcef R. Rahal
Arabeyes.org
http://www.arabeyes.org/~rahal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAOaU1HDRR6Cd0eSYRAspIAKDqi9/TeuEmaAPEgcPjRg1gTJtswgCfaOOC
rM2zhSAexYgT93Gc8JnX7Ws=
=T5PB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----