On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Youcef Rabah Rahal wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:04:04 +0200, Mohammed Sameer <msameer at foolab dot org> wrote: > > > well, I did a commit next day, But this didn't prevent the account from being deactivated. > > Hmm, strange. I would be be interested to know how the status became > 'active' again. > I really don't know. One must look at the logs to know and I don't have access to them. > > This is not related to the main topic, Why do we inactivate the CVSaccounts ? I can understand if they are affecting the server performance and/or they huge turning the life of the admin maintaining it into hell! > > And I don't think that any of the 2 things apply here. > > This is totally decorrelated from the CVS commit rights. IUt is just a > way to _automatically tag_ inactive accounts! > And why have inactive accounts from the beginning !!! -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer. GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature