[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bidi-less Applications Patching Policy
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Bidi-less Applications Patching Policy
- From: Muhammad Alkarouri <malkarouri at yahoo dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 18:59:31 +0100 (BST)
--- Mohammed Elzubeir <elzubeir at arabeyes dot org> wrote:
> Then, you have cases like PuTTY where it was more than just a license
> issue.. it was a matter of policy to not used shared libraries. What do
> we do here? We really had no choice.
In PuTTY it was a matter of policy == a matter of personal liking. A fork of
PuTTY with bidi support is almost as good (as bad) as a replacement of existing
BiDi implementation. Why don't Arabeyes people feel they are respectable enough
to have a policy not changed whenever someone outside 'has a policy'?
> I agree -- but what about the instances where it's not an option?
Due to policy issues or technically?
> > That's the root of our disagreement ;).
> That's a personal preference -- has nothing to do with
If reasons are due to 'policy' issues, then personal preferences have
everything to do with it. It was a personal preference to join Arabeyes, not a
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now