On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 15:59, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > Nop, I didn't get a reply to this before. > i talked much about the advantages of autogen.sh as it's a script, And > thus we can put many tests more easy. > ok, now what's the general consensus ?? > Well, I just need a few hands saying autogen.sh (people who have contributed to Arabeyes have bigger hands of course ;) and I will make the change. > > Learning Makefile structure as opposed to shell scripting? Really.. both > > are worth learning if you plan to do any development ;) > no, I don't think so. > <shrug> > ok, and what if I want to generate documentation using gtk-doc ? Why > do I have to write the comments 2 times ? > and I didn't know that gtk-doc has changed ? > You're right. If there are discrepencies then.. well, too bad. But, if you are writing a GTK-based program or a console based one, you will be commenting your code the same way. If you are opening up any Arabeyes project, you should be able to see the same commenting style. I know this may not be what you want, but it is for the greater benefit of the project as a whole. > sorry, I prefere leaving the versioning system to the developer. > It was left to the Quran project authors.. look at the kind of versioning nightmare it's in ;) I don't even know what is what anymore. You may have others rally with you on the autogen.sh issue, but on this, I have Nadim on my side, and he's known to be vicious ;) Regards -- ------------------------------------------------------- | Mohammed Elzubeir | Visit us at: | | | http://www.arabeyes.org/ | | Arabeyes Project | Homepage: | | Unix the 'right' way | http://elzubeir.fakkir.net/ | -------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part