[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ITL release
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: ITL release
- From: Nadim Shaikli <shaikli at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:05:51 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=52zLStMXPMCmr+Vzzq1+tSuC4kAEQ6pDmoZiCFVJnB8eg/eM4fZ2bagzJG23YPFatIQ053KDB7tHou/368RTYHMdyNoPCz52IC9tso4EUumfdT6WPKF9aYuJUrRazJNEE55/DxuXOR/Ni0s2k+yOsY4koJIOc1RmMnkloDhvecA= ;
--- Ayman Negm <a dot negm at gmx dot de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 12:36:06PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> > ireminder.pl is a script that is meant to simply have a '--help'
> > command-line option. I saw Thamer's request for a manpage, but
> > dismissed it thinking it was overkill. Is there a place to put
> > scripts in debian (aside from the locations lintian checks)
> > that we can use (maybe /var/lib/itl/bin/ or /usr/share/ or similar) ?
> I think it is not that difficult to write a small manpage with the content
> of ireminder.pl --help output in man way ;-)
It's not a question of difficult or easy - it just doesn't make sense to
have manpages for all simplistic scripts (more below).
> > Come to think of it, all the binaries ought to go to /var/lib/itl/bin
> > instead of the current /usr/bin - that seems to be what most pacakges
> > are doing anyways, no ?
> No, itools is a tool which need the itl lib _not_ vice versa. All runable
> programmes or scripts by the user should be in _/usr/bin_ and all runable
> files should have a manpage.
A number of applications (like 'mailman' for instance) seem to create their
own tree (and bin/ dirs) under /var/lib and I thought we could do the same;
With regard to the .pl script, can't we store it in any other location that
doesn't require a manpage ? /usr/share/itl/ or .... ? There are plenty of
scripts that I use on a daily basis (perl or python) that aren't in /usr/bin.
--- Thamer Mahmoud <thamer at newkuwait dot org> wrote:
> Ayman Negm writes:
> > AFAIK it does not required for Perl scripts to have .pl extension,
> > so without this .pl it make ireminder handy for the user ;)
> Nadim, is that OK with you?
I'd rather we don't - its there for a reason and its not mean to
look or function like a full-fledged application. I just queried
my debian installation ('locate .pl') and ended-up with plenty of
'em in various directories most notably in /usr/share (none with
manpages either :-). So I'd much rather we put all these supporting
scripts, etc (and there will be others) in /usr/share/itl/ if possible.
Do you Yahoo!?
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.