[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: even member votes
- To: Core Arabeyes Management Team <core at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: even member votes
- From: Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj <aalarfaj at gmail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 12:34:39 +0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oPc7PA1wW81fZVxHrgX/g+nd8DllB8TU4B141uHQrXfNzWhjLPJEg3p4ccjgMTBs1ak+++yLdGHDAFL0Z2sHV7NH7BHtLzuTV9rT35Xb4XPN1cb0sOsQVXia6dolfbNt1hhy7kWh8I74NqYtt/RBZ+ksC7tZL4uxoyiw5rZG6sM=
On 5/5/05, Nadim Shaikli <shaikli at yahoo dot com> wrote:
[...]
> You didn't read close enough then :-) This is meant to force
> a more strict rotation system in our meeting "driver" apparatus.
> The listing of people in the agenda is alphabetical for a reason
> and that's how we can easily follow who will drive, etc. If a
> person isn't there when it is their turn then they can be skipped
> and scheduled to drive the next meeting, etc. Plus when one
> person is missing the driver gets to vote since we'd be an odd
> number, etc.
Ah, thats actually better then. Then so be it.
[...]
> I agree, but this complicates things and I was after a simple solution
> that would be light and that would work in most if not all cases. Do
> please write-up what you have in mind so that we can vote on it :-)
> just kidding - so we can discuss it briefly and so that if it's opted
> for we can easily add it to the handbook (make it short and to the
> point (and did I mention clear :-)).
Nah, forget about what I said :-). The All-Will-Vote-Except-Driver
idea should work. Lets go with that. If the other core members agree
we can add it to the handbook asap.
Abdulaziz,